Return to front page | Return to News Archive
[Ben]:Inconsistent Defintions Discuss This [0 comments so far] View Comments
It appears that the Federal Government has decided to sue Arizona for their recent anti-immigration law.

One reason given is that this law "crossed a constitutional line."

Just to be clear, cities and states violate the Constitution's Second Amendment by banning firearms and they're golden, but when a state passes a law which enforces something the Federal Government already considers to be illegal and suddenly they're crossing constitutional lines?
Permanent Link:
Inconsistent Defintions Home
User ID:
Register here
180 users 8210 posts 0 active users
Contact Administrator
Contact Picture of the Day
Picture Archive
New images
Picture of the day
The LawDog Files
View From the Porch
Alex Mattingly
Smallest Minority
Individual Sponsors
Thrim LLC
©2024 by Ben Swenson.   All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
     Hosted by: